Severe hypophosphataemia following oral bisphosphonate treatment in a patient with osteoporosis

  1. Louise Wulff Bagger 1,
  2. Per Kim Dyhr Hansen 1,
  3. Peter Schwarz 2 , 3 and
  4. Barbara Rubek Nielsen 1
  1. 1 Department of Internal Medicine M, Geriatric Section, Amager Hvidovre Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark
  2. 2 Department of Endocrinology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  3. 3 Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Louise Wulff Bagger; louisewc@hotmail.com

Publication history

Accepted:14 Sep 2020
First published:08 Oct 2020
Online issue publication:08 Oct 2020

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

A 76-year-old woman was treated with oral bisphosphonate, alendronate, for osteoporosis in an outpatient clinic. Routine blood tests 4 months after alendronate prescription surprisingly revealed severe hypophosphataemia. The patient was hospitalised and treated with intravenous and oral phosphate supplements. Alendronate was later reintroduced as treatment for osteoporosis and the patient once again presented with severe hypophosphataemia in subsequent routine blood tests. The patient had only presented with lower extremity pain, muscle weakness and difficulty walking. Blood tests in the emergency department both times reconfirmed severe hypophosphataemia. Plasma (p-)ionised calcium levels were normal or slightly elevated and p-parathyroid hormone levels were normal or slightly suppressed. The p-25-hydroxyvitamin-D and p-creatine were in the normal range. Critical illness, malabsorption, nutritional issues and genetics were reviewed as potential causes but considered unlikely. Phosphate levels were quickly restored each time on replacement therapy and the case was interpreted as bisphosphonate-induced severe hypophosphataemia.

Background

Bisphosphonates are commonly used in pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis. They have an antiresorptive effect on bone metabolism which, potentially, affects both calcium and phosphate homeostasis. Mild and transient decreases in p-calcium and p-phosphate are thus frequent side effects.1 Few cases of bisphosphonate-induced severe hypophosphataemia have been reported but only following intravenous administration of the potent bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid.2–4

Severe hypophosphataemia is defined as p-phosphate <0.3 mmol/L. It is a potentially fatal condition where symptoms include bone pain, muscle weakness, rhabdomyolysis, arrhythmias, convulsions, confusion and loss of conscious.5

We report a clinically relevant case of two consecutive episodes of severe hypophosphataemia following oral administration of alendronate in a challenge–dechallenge–rechallenge scenario. This is to our knowledge the first case of severe hypophosphataemia following oral bisphosphonate treatment in a patient with osteoporosis.

Case presentation

A 76-year-old woman was referred to the osteoporosis outpatient clinic due to a random finding of a non-traumatic vertebral compression fracture on a CT scan (figure 1). She had earlier been diagnosed with a microcytic (82 mmol/L), hypochromic (19.1 mmol/L) anaemia (haemoglobin 108 g/L) due to iron deficiency (ferritin 21 mg/L) and undergone investigations, including the CT scan, for malignancy and malabsorption without any findings. The patient was previously supplemented with oral iron supplements (ferrous sulfate 200 mg daily).

Figure 1

Timeline showing investigations, hospitalisations, pharmacy records and follow-up visits during the case period. Horizontal line indicating time. Vertical lines above timeline show outpatient follow-up and hospitalisations. Vertical lines below timeline show paraclinical investigations. Lab#: blood tests (see table 1). Supl., supplements; Vit D, vitamin D.

Furthermore, the patient had a history of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, type 2 diabetes and ischaemic heart disease for which she was treated with amlodipine, enalapril, atorvastatin, metformin, vildagliptin and acetylsalicylic acid.

In the outpatient clinic, a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) showed osteopenia (T-score lumbar spine (L2–L4) −2.1, femoral neck left −2.4 and right −2.2, total hip left −2.2 and right –2.3) but due to the significant compression fracture of the 12th thoracic vertebra the patient was diagnosed with manifest osteoporosis, yet without clinical symptoms. The aetiology was evaluated to be postmenopausal osteoporosis as secondary causes were excluded, such as primary hyperparathyroidism, thyrotoxicosis, chronic kidney disease, Chron’s disease or treatment with glucocorticoids or other potential medications. The patient was prescribed with oral alendronate 70 mg once weekly as well as magnesium hydroxide 360 mg, calcium carbonate 800 mg and cholecalciferol 20 μg daily.

Follow-up after 4 months showed good patient compliance which was confirmed with the finding of suppressed bone markers (p-P1NP and p-CTx) and the patient experienced no subjective side effects. Pharmacy records confirmed collection of alendronate and did not suggest overdosage (figure 1). However, blood tests surprisingly revealed severe hypophosphataemia (p-phosphate 0.20 mmol/L, reference range 0.76–1.41 mmol/L, table 1).

Table 1

Relevant blood tests

Lab # Timeline Phosphate
(0.76–1.41
mmol/L)
Ionised Ca
(1.18–1.32
mmol/L)
PTH
(1.48–7.63
mmol/L)
25-OH-D
(>50
nmol/L)
Mg
(0.71–0.94
mmol/L)
eGFR
(>60 mL/min/1.73 m2)
 1 Day 1 1.22 1.23 2.71 64 0.64 ↓ 67
ALN start
 2 Day 125 0.20 ↓ 1.32 1.0 ↓ 80 0.71 53
ALN stop
 3 Day 126 0.27 ↓ 1.35 (↑) 54
 4 Day 127 0.46 ↓ 1.24 1.08 ↓ 79 0.66 ↓ 56
 5 Day 128 1.23 1.19 1.69 0.60 ↓ 64
 6 Day 136 1.66 ↑ 1.26 2.69 62 0.69 (↓) 61
 7 Day 252 1,06 1.23 3.19 43 ↓ 0.62 ↓ 55
ALN start
 8 Day 284 <0,16 ↓ 1.33 (↑) 1.04 ↓ 75 0.76 56
 9 Day 288 <0,16 ↓ 1.26 0.95 ↓ 0.73 58
ALN stop
 10 Day 289 0.42 ↓ 0.68 (↓) 65
 11 Day 290 0.95 0.73 61
 12 Day 291 1.10 1.30 1.28 ↓ 61
 13 Day 296 1.63↑ 1.18
 14 Day 298 1.35 1.21 0.76 65
  • Lab # corresponds to timeline in figure 1.

  • (↓), slightly decreased; (↑), slightly increased; ↑, increased; ↓, deceased; ALN, alendronate; Ca, calcium; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; Mg, magnesium; 25-OH-D, 25-hydroxylated vitamin D; PTH, parathyroid hormone.

The patient was hospitalised for acute treatment. Her only problem was pain in both feet. There was no prior history of diarrhoea, nutritional issues or alcohol misuse. The patient did not use antacids, proton-pump inhibitors or diuretics. Physical examination and vital parameters were all normal. ECG and telemetry (18 hours) were without signs of arrhythmias. Blood tests reconfirmed severe hypophosphataemia (table 1). Phosphate levels were restored within 3 days during hospitalisation and alendronate treatment, as well as calcium and vitamin D supplements, were paused. The patient was discharged to outpatient follow-up (figure 1).

Short follow-up after discharge only showed slightly elevated phosphate levels (table 1). Four months after the episode of severe hypophosphataemia, plasma phosphate levels were normal and alendronate, calcium and vitamin D supplements were resumed as treatment for osteoporosis (figure 1). One month after reintroduction of alendronate, the patient once again presented unaffected with severe hypophosphataemia (p-phosphate<0.16 mmol/L), but reported pain and muscular weakness of left hip and leg and difficulty walking. The hypophosphataemia was corrected during hospitalisation and alendronate treatment discontinued (figure 1).

Investigations

Hypophosphataemia was never observed in this patient prior to alendronate treatment. Due to her history of iron deficiency, the patient was previously investigated for malignancy and malabsorption without any findings including normal gastroscopy and colonoscopy, normal thoracic/abdominal CT-scan, negative M-component, negative screening for coeliac disease and normal levels of faecal calprotectin and elastase.

Baseline blood tests prior to alendronate treatment were all within the normal range despite a random finding of a mild hypomagnesaemia (table 1).

During both episodes of severe hypophosphataemia and in subsequent follow-up, a complete set of blood tests were obtained in order to evaluate phosphate metabolism, including p-phosphate, p-ionised calcium, p-parathyroid hormone (p-PTH), p-25-OH-D, p-magnesium and estimated glomerular filtration rate (table 1). Laboratory values for alkaline phosphatase, potassium and indicators of haemolysis, such as lactate dehydrogenase, bilirubin and haptoglobin, were all within the normal range.

When the patient presented with severe hypophosphataemia the first time, blood tests aside from confirmation of severe hypophosphataemia showed ionised calcium levels high within the reference range or slightly elevated, suppressed p-PTH levels, and the pre-existing hypomagnesaemia. Phosphate levels were quickly normalised and after phosphate replacement therapy, a transient hyperphosphatemia was observed. The same tendency in the blood tests was seen during the second episode of hypophosphataemia.

Urine-phosphate and fibroblast growth factor-23 levels were not evaluated (see the Discussion section).

Due to the patient history of iron deficiency and a persisting mild hypomagnesaemia, malabsorption was considered as a cause for hypophosphataemia. Therefore, indicators of malabsorption, such as albumin levels (35–40 g/L), fecal-calprotectin (41 mg/kg), fecal-elastase (398 µg/g) and tissue transglutaminase antibodies (negative), were re-evaluated. Patient body mass index (BMI) was calculated to 22.2.

Differential diagnosis

In a case of severe hypophosphataemia, several mechanisms and hence underlying differential diagnoses must be considered. In general, there are three major mechanisms by which hypophosphataemia can occur: redistribution of phosphate into cells from extracellular fluids, decreased intestinal absorption of phosphate and increased urinary phosphate loss.5 6

Redistribution of phosphate can be observed in refeeding syndrome, ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic, sepsis and following insulin treatment. Our patient did not, at any point suffer from sepsis, critically illness, or starvation. Even though the patient was diabetic, blood glucose levels remained within the normal range during the episodes of hypophosphataemia and the patient did not receive insulin at any time. Consequently, redistribution of phosphate as a mechanism for the severe hypophosphataemia was ruled out.

Decreased intestinal absorption of phosphate is linked to inadequate intake, alcohol misuse, chronic diarrhoea, vitamin D deficiency, use of phosphorous-binding antacids and malabsorption.

However, the patient confirmed a varied diet containing dairy products, had a normal BMI, had no history of alcohol misuse and had a normal stool pattern. Vitamin D deficiency was ruled out in the blood tests and she did not use phosphorous-binding antacids or proton-pump inhibitors.

Malabsorption was considered in the case as the patient also had a history of iron deficiency and hypomagnesaemia. However, previous and repeated investigations for malabsorption, including coeliac disease, were all negative. Albumin levels were within the normal range. Furthermore, both episodes of severe hypophosphataemia were predominantly corrected by oral phosphate replenishment. Consequently, malabsorption did not seem likely as the only cause for hypophosphataemia, but could not be ruled out entirely.

Increased urinary loss of phosphate is seen following primary hyperparathyroidism, vitamin D deficiency, diuretics and some rare genetic disorders. Hyperparathyroidism and vitamin D deficiency were not present and the patient denied any family history of calcium or phosphate disturbances. As the patient had never experienced hypophosphataemia prior to the alendronate treatment, genetic disorders were considered very unlikely.

Drug-induced hypophosphataemia was strongly considered. The patient did not receive any antacids, proton-pump inhibitors, chemotherapy, diuretics or steroids that could cause drug-induced hypophosphataemia. Moreover, she was not using iron supplementations during the times hypophosphataemia did occur. However, the fact that hypophosphataemia first developed following alendronate treatment (challenge), no episodes of hypophosphataemia was observed during the period where alendronate was paused (dechallenge) and hypophosphataemia reoccurred when alendronate was resumed (rechallenge), posed a strong indication that bisphosphonate-induced hypophosphataemia was the most likely diagnosis.

Treatment

During the first hospitalisation, the patient received oral phosphate replacement therapy (20 mmol three times a day with an oral solution containing a combination of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and disodium phosphate dihydrate). p-Phosphate was restored after 2 days and the patient was discharged on day 3. The second episode of severe hypophosphataemia was initially treated with intravenous phosphate (20 mmol once with Addiphos, a combination of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and disodium phosphate dihydrate) the first day and followed by oral phosphate replacement (20 mmol two times per day). p-Phosphate was normalised within 2 days.

Outcome and follow-up

The patient survived both episodes of severe hypophosphataemia and ongoing follow-up in the outpatient clinic was established. After the second episode of hypophosphataemia, alendronate was registered as a medical CAVE to indicate that the patient did not tolerate bisphosphonate treatment. As a future treatment for osteoporosis, denosumab (Prolia) was chosen. Interestingly, follow-up blood tests after the first dose of denosumab, showed a mild and transient hypophosphataemia. This episode of hypophosphataemia was untreated and spontaneously reversed after 2 weeks.

The patient later on represented with iron deficiency and moderate asymptomatic hypophosphataemia and was referred to gastroenterological re-evaluation for malabsorption. Once again, faecal parameters and coeliac screening were negative, however, malabsorption could not be ruled out at this point.

After correction of hypophosphataemia, the patient’s symptoms of lower extremity pain, muscle weakness and difficulty walking persisted and the cause was re-evaluated. During hospitalisation, an ultrasound of the hip, a CT scan of the pelvis and MRI of the lumbar spine were performed (figure 1). The ultrasound and CT scan were both normal but the MRI of the lumbar spine revealed severe lumbar spinal stenosis for which the patient underwent surgery relieving the symptoms completely.

Discussion

Bisphosphonates are known to cause mild and transient hypocalcaemia and hypophosphataemia.7 8 Due to an inhibition of osteoclasts, they reduce bone demineralisation. This antiresorptive effect has been proposed to decrease the release of both calcium and phosphate from bone into the extracellular fluid.9

Another potential mechanism for bisphosphonate-induced hypophosphataemia is a secondary increase in PTH in response to the decrease in calcium levels.6 9 Increased PTH would promote elevated excretion of phosphate in the urine.

In our case at 4 months follow-up, p-PTH is surprisingly decreased rather than increased during bisphosphonate treatment. The decreased PTH levels are accompanied by a simultaneous slightly increased ionised calcium level (or high in the reference interval, table 1). As calcium is the most important modulator of PTH secretion, this could explain why p-PTH does not increase in this case. We believe that the ionised calcium levels reflect the fact that the patient received calcium and vitamin D supplementations during the treatment period.

Another surprising aspect of this case was the lack of clinical manifestations in the two episodes of severe hypophosphataemia. Generally, we would have expected a patient with severe hypophosphataemia to present with neuromuscular symptoms, bone pain, rhabdomyolysis, arrhythmias, convulsions, confusion or loss of conscious.5 Aside from her lower extremity symptoms, the patient had no such manifestations. A potential explanation could be that the concomitant symptoms of the severe central spinal stenosis (gait difficulty, muscle weakness, lower extremity pain) may have blurred or overruled potential neuromuscular symptoms of the hypophosphataemia. Another hypothesis could be that if the severe hypophosphataemia in our case developed very gradually, this could have resulted in less evident symptoms.

One of the important limitations to the investigations, in this case report, is the lack of urine-phosphate assessment. This test could help explore the pathophysiology underlying hypophosphataemia. In our case, we would have expected elevated levels of urine-phosphate indicating hypophosphataemia due to increased renal excretion of phosphate which is seen in bisphosphonate-induced hypophosphataemia.6

Fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) levels were also not investigated as this blood test is not routinely available in the internal medical wards. FGF-23 is an important modulator of phosphate metabolism and would have been an interesting contributor to the interpretation of the existing results. The effect of alendronate on FGF-23 levels are debated but a study of zoledronic acid and ibandronate showed bisphosphonate-induced reduction in bone turnover and FGF-23-levels.10 Phosphate has not been shown to directly influence FGF-23 regulation, but reduced levels of FGF-23 has been seen in patients with chronic hypophosphataemia.11 Consequently, in this case, we would have expected to find normal or low FGF-23 levels.

Mild, asymptomatic and transient hypophosphataemia is a potential side effect to bisphosphonate treatment,1 including alendronate.8 Bisphosphonate-induced severe hypophosphataemia has previously only been reported following intravenous administration of potent bisphosphonates, such as zoledronic acid and pamidronate.2–4 12

One case describes severe and prolonged (30 days) hypophosphataemia on zoledronic acid treatment for malignant hypercalcemia.2 The patient, in this case, was admitted to the intensive care unit and did not survive. This case differs from ours with regards to the duration of hypophosphataemia and the severity of symptoms. This patient, aside from malignant and critical illness, suffered from a concomitant substantial vitamin D deficiency which makes the cases incomparable.

Two other cases also report severe hypophosphataemia following intravenous zoledronic acid but in patients with osteoporosis.3 4 In the first case, the patient is delirious and severe hypocalcemia and hypophosphataemia is observed. Unfortunately, PTH and vitamin D levels are not investigated, which make a comparison of mechanisms underlying the hypophosphataemia difficult.3 In the second case, the patient had an unrecognised hyperparathyroidism which may have aggravated phosphate loss during bisphosphonate treatment.4 An increased urine-phosphate confirmed a renal cause of hypophosphataemia and contrasts our findings with regards to PTH levels (see above).

Compared with the above-mentioned case studies, our case is the first to report severe hypophosphataemia on an oral bisphosphonate. Follow-up on the patient reintroduced malabsorption as a potential contributor to hypophosphataemia which might explain the severity as a mild malabsorptive state could have rendered this patient particularly vulnerable to bisphosphonate-induced hypophosphataemia.

Both national and international clinical guidelines recommend bisphosphonates as a first choice for treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.13 14 The guidelines do not include specific recommendations regarding baseline or follow-up control of phosphate levels before and after bisphosphonate treatment. Suspected malabsorption is not mentioned as a cause for concern using bisphosphonates in the guidelines.

Based on this unique case of severe asymptomatic hypophosphataemia following oral bisphosphonate treatment in a woman with osteoporosis and potential malabsorptive issues emphasises the importance of systematic control and follow-up on phosphate levels during bisphosphonate treatment and suggests a cautious approach to patients with simultaneous risk factors for hypophosphataemia, such as malabsorption.

Learning points

  • Hypophosphataemia can result from different complex mechanisms which all need to be considered when treating a patient with severe hypophosphataemia.

  • Drug-induced severe hypophosphataemia can be provoked by orally administered bisphosphonates, such as alendronate, especially with other risk factors present in the same patient.

  • Additional caution should be taken when prescribing bisphosphonates to patients with concurrent conditions that can affect phosphate metabolism, such as malabsorption.

  • It is crucial to ensure follow-up on calcium and phosphate levels on the prescription of bisphosphonates—also in routine treatment of osteoporosis.

Footnotes

  • Contributors LWB, PKDH and BRN conceived the idea of the case report. Patient was under the care of PKDH. Case report was written by LWB and critically revised by PKDH, PS and BRN. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer